Updated Sunday Nov. 30
2025 Composite College Football Power Rankings
Calculated by aggregating computer generated college football power rankings from around the web and determining each team’s average ranking.
| TEAM | CONFERENCECONF | AVERAGE RANKINGAVG |
1-WEEK MOVE |
HI/LO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ohio StateOSU12-0
|
Big Ten | 1.0 | - | 1/1 |
| 2 |
IndianaIND12-0
|
Big Ten | 2.5 | - | 2/4 |
| 3 |
Notre DameND10-2
|
Independent | 3.3 | ↑ 2 | 2/5 |
| 4 |
OregonORE11-1
|
Big Ten | 3.5 | ↓ 1 | 3/4 |
| 5 |
AlabamaALA10-2
|
SEC | 6.3 | ↑ 1 | 6/7 |
| 6 |
GeorgiaUGA11-1
|
SEC | 6.5 | ↓ 2 | 4/9 |
| 7 |
Texas TechTTU11-1
|
Big 12 | 6.8 | ↑ 1 | 5/9 |
| 8 |
Texas A&MTAMU11-1
|
SEC | 8.5 | ↓ 1 | 6/10 |
| 9 |
MiamiMIA10-2
|
ACC | 9.5 | ↑ 4 | 7/14 |
| 10 |
Ole MissMISS11-1
|
SEC | 10.3 | - | 7/12 |
| 11 |
UtahUTAH10-2
|
Big 12 | 10.5 | ↓ 2 | 7/13 |
| 12 |
OklahomaOKLA10-2
|
SEC | 12.5 | ↑ 2 | 10/16 |
| 13 |
USCUSC9-3
|
Big Ten | 13.5 | ↓ 2 | 11/16 |
| 14 |
TexasTEX9-3
|
SEC | 14.0 | ↓ 2 | 12/16 |
| 15 |
VanderbiltVAN10-2
|
SEC | 14.3 | ↑ 1 | 14/15 |
| 16 |
BYUBYU11-1
|
Big 12 | 16.0 | ↓ 1 | 11/20 |
| 17 |
Penn StatePSU6-6
|
Big Ten | 17.0 | ↑ 4 | 12/22 |
| 18 |
IowaIOWA8-4
|
Big Ten | 18.5 | - | 15/21 |
| 19 |
TennesseeTENN8-4
|
SEC | 18.8 | ↓ 2 | 17/21 |
| 20 |
MichiganMICH9-3
|
Big Ten | 19.3 | ↓ 1 | 17/22 |
| 21 |
WashingtonWASH8-4
|
Big Ten | 20.3 | ↑ 2 | 19/22 |
| 22 |
MissouriMIZ8-4
|
SEC | 21.8 | - | 21/23 |
| 23 |
LSULSU7-5
|
SEC | 24.3 | ↓ 3 | 23/26 |
| 24 |
SMUSMU8-4
|
ACC | 24.3 | ↑ 1 | 18/30 |
| 25 |
AuburnAUB5-7
|
SEC | 27.3 | ↑ 1 | 24/35 |
| 26 |
ArizonaARIZ9-3
|
Big 12 | 28.0 | ↑ 11 | 24/35 |
| 27 |
IllinoisILL8-4
|
Big Ten | 29.3 | ↓ 3 | 26/32 |
| 28 |
ClemsonCLEM7-5
|
ACC | 30.8 | ↑ 1 | 27/38 |
| 29 |
James MadisonJMU11-1
|
Sun Belt | 31.0 | ↑ 12 | 28/35 |
| 30 |
LouisvilleLOU8-4
|
ACC | 31.3 | ↓ 2 | 29/36 |
| 31 |
USFUSF9-3
|
American | 31.8 | ↑ 8 | 23/42 |
| 32 |
Iowa StateISU8-4
|
Big 12 | 33.3 | ↑ 4 | 25/37 |
| 33 |
PittsburghPITT8-4
|
ACC | 33.8 | - | 27/38 |
| 34 |
South CarolinaSC4-8
|
SEC | 33.8 | ↓ 2 | 25/45 |
| 35 |
VirginiaUVA10-2
|
ACC | 36.5 | ↑ 8 | 31/42 |
| 36 |
TCUTCU8-4
|
Big 12 | 36.8 | ↑ 6 | 27/48 |
| 37 |
FloridaFLA4-8
|
SEC | 37.3 | ↓ 3 | 32/43 |
| 38 |
Arizona StateASU8-4
|
Big 12 | 37.3 | ↑ 2 | 28/44 |
| 39 |
Florida StateFSU5-7
|
ACC | 37.8 | ↓ 9 | 28/59 |
| 40 |
Georgia TechGT9-3
|
ACC | 39.0 | ↓ 9 | 33/42 |
| 41 |
North TexasUNT11-1
|
American | 39.0 | ↑ 6 | 36/42 |
| 42 |
Kansas StateKSU6-6
|
Big 12 | 39.8 | ↑ 2 | 39/41 |
| 43 |
NebraskaNEB7-5
|
Big Ten | 41.3 | ↓ 16 | 37/44 |
| 44 |
CincinnatiCIN7-5
|
Big 12 | 45.3 | ↓ 6 | 44/47 |
| 45 |
KentuckyUK5-7
|
SEC | 46.3 | ↓ 10 | 39/52 |
| 46 |
HoustonHOU9-3
|
Big 12 | 48.0 | ↑ 2 | 34/54 |
| 47 |
ArkansasARK2-10
|
SEC | 48.8 | ↓ 1 | 41/68 |
| 48 |
DukeDUKE7-5
|
ACC | 49.0 | ↑ 2 | 46/52 |
| 49 |
Mississippi StateMSST5-7
|
SEC | 49.3 | ↓ 4 | 46/51 |
| 50 |
NC StateNCST7-5
|
ACC | 50.0 | ↑ 5 | 46/56 |
| 51 |
WisconsinWIS4-8
|
Big Ten | 51.0 | ↑ 7 | 45/60 |
| 52 |
TulaneTULN10-2
|
American | 52.8 | ↑ 2 | 39/63 |
| 53 |
KansasKU5-7
|
Big 12 | 54.8 | ↓ 2 | 47/66 |
| 54 |
Boise StateBSU8-4
|
MW | 55.3 | ↑ 5 | 51/58 |
| 55 |
NorthwesternNW6-6
|
Big Ten | 55.5 | ↑ 2 | 50/59 |
| 56 |
MinnesotaMINN7-5
|
Big Ten | 56.3 | ↓ 3 | 48/63 |
| 57 |
BaylorBAY5-7
|
Big 12 | 56.5 | ↓ 8 | 51/60 |
| 58 |
MemphisMEM8-4
|
American | 56.5 | ↓ 6 | 48/63 |
| 59 |
Wake ForestWAKE8-4
|
ACC | 58.0 | ↑ 1 | 49/66 |
| 60 |
Old DominionODU9-3
|
Sun Belt | 58.8 | ↑ 3 | 53/65 |
| 61 |
ToledoTOL8-4
|
MAC | 60.3 | ↑ 1 | 53/75 |
| 62 |
ECUECU8-4
|
American | 60.3 | ↓ 6 | 52/68 |
| 63 |
RutgersRUTG5-7
|
Big Ten | 60.5 | ↓ 2 | 58/62 |
| 64 |
UNLVUNLV10-2
|
MW | 62.3 | ↑ 7 | 55/68 |
| 65 |
Michigan StateMSU4-8
|
Big Ten | 63.5 | ↑ 3 | 61/66 |
| 66 |
Washington StateWSU6-6
|
Pac-12 | 64.3 | ↑ 4 | 61/67 |
| 67 |
NavyNAVY9-2
|
American | 65.3 | ↑ 6 | 54/71 |
| 68 |
San Diego StateSDSU9-3
|
MW | 68.5 | ↓ 3 | 67/70 |
| 69 |
UCFUCF5-7
|
Big 12 | 69.8 | ↓ 5 | 65/78 |
| 70 |
UT San AntonioUTSA6-6
|
American | 69.8 | ↑ 7 | 64/78 |
| 71 |
UCLAUCLA3-9
|
Big Ten | 72.8 | ↓ 5 | 69/77 |
| 72 |
Virginia TechVT3-9
|
ACC | 73.5 | ↑ 3 | 69/80 |
| 73 |
MarylandMD4-8
|
Big Ten | 73.5 | ↓ 6 | 72/76 |
| 74 |
CaliforniaCAL7-5
|
ACC | 73.8 | ↓ 2 | 61/80 |
| 75 |
West VirginiaWVU4-8
|
Big 12 | 74.3 | ↓ 6 | 70/82 |
| 76 |
ConnecticutCONN9-3
|
Independent | 75.0 | - | 71/81 |
| 77 |
StanfordSTAN4-8
|
ACC | 78.0 | ↑ 8 | 72/81 |
| 78 |
New MexicoUNM9-3
|
MW | 79.0 | ↑ 8 | 72/85 |
| 79 |
ColoradoCOLO3-9
|
Big 12 | 79.8 | ↓ 5 | 76/89 |
| 80 |
Utah StateUSU6-6
|
MW | 80.5 | ↑ 7 | 74/86 |
| 81 |
OhioOHIO8-4
|
MAC | 82.0 | ↓ 3 | 79/85 |
| 82 |
Texas StateTXST6-6
|
Sun Belt | 82.8 | ↑ 6 | 76/93 |
| 83 |
ArmyARMY6-5
|
American | 84.0 | ↓ 2 | 74/92 |
| 84 |
Fresno StateFRES8-4
|
MW | 84.0 | - | 77/91 |
| 85 |
North CarolinaUNC4-8
|
ACC | 85.0 | ↓ 6 | 75/92 |
| 86 |
Western MichiganWMU8-4
|
MAC | 85.0 | ↑ 3 | 81/91 |
| 87 |
HawaiiHAW8-4
|
MW | 85.3 | ↓ 5 | 83/87 |
| 88 |
PurduePUR2-10
|
Big Ten | 85.3 | ↓ 5 | 81/88 |
| 89 |
Miami (OH)M-OH7-5
|
MAC | 85.8 | ↑ 1 | 83/89 |
| 90 |
Boston CollegeBC2-10
|
ACC | 86.3 | ↑ 3 | 78/92 |
| 91 |
Western KentuckyWKU8-4
|
C-USA | 92.0 | ↑ 4 | 90/95 |
| 92 |
SyracuseSYR3-9
|
ACC | 92.5 | ↓ 12 | 88/101 |
| 93 |
TroyTROY8-4
|
Sun Belt | 93.5 | ↑ 1 | 89/96 |
| 94 |
LA TechLT7-5
|
C-USA | 94.0 | ↑ 2 | 90/98 |
| 95 |
MarshallMRSH5-7
|
Sun Belt | 94.8 | ↓ 4 | 91/97 |
| 96 |
Kennesaw StateKENN9-3
|
C-USA | 96.3 | ↑ 4 | 94/101 |
| 97 |
Air ForceAFA4-8
|
MW | 98.8 | ↑ 1 | 94/103 |
| 98 |
Southern MissUSM7-5
|
Sun Belt | 99.0 | ↓ 6 | 95/106 |
| 99 |
Jacksonville StateJSU8-4
|
C-USA | 99.8 | - | 94/105 |
| 100 |
UL LafayetteULL6-6
|
Sun Belt | 100.0 | ↑ 3 | 93/105 |
| 101 |
Central MichiganCMU7-5
|
MAC | 101.0 | ↑ 1 | 97/106 |
| 102 |
TempleTEM5-7
|
American | 101.5 | ↓ 5 | 98/108 |
| 103 |
Arkansas StateARST6-6
|
Sun Belt | 104.8 | ↑ 2 | 100/109 |
| 104 |
FIUFIU7-5
|
C-USA | 105.3 | ↑ 13 | 100/110 |
| 105 |
Missouri StateMOST7-5
|
C-USA | 106.0 | ↑ 2 | 102/111 |
| 106 |
South AlabamaUSA4-8
|
Sun Belt | 106.8 | ↑ 4 | 99/116 |
| 107 |
Oklahoma StateOKST1-11
|
Big 12 | 107.3 | ↑ 8 | 100/113 |
| 108 |
Ga SouthernGASO6-6
|
Sun Belt | 107.5 | ↓ 4 | 104/110 |
| 109 |
LibertyLIB4-8
|
C-USA | 108.3 | ↓ 1 | 100/121 |
| 110 |
WyomingWYO4-8
|
MW | 108.8 | ↓ 9 | 107/111 |
| 111 |
FAUFAU4-8
|
American | 110.3 | - | 104/115 |
| 112 |
Oregon StateORST2-10
|
Pac-12 | 110.5 | ↓ 3 | 106/114 |
| 113 |
Appalachian StateAPP5-7
|
Sun Belt | 113.5 | - | 112/115 |
| 114 |
Coastal CarolinaCCAR6-6
|
Sun Belt | 113.8 | ↓ 8 | 105/123 |
| 115 |
BuffaloBUFF5-7
|
MAC | 116.8 | ↓ 1 | 112/120 |
| 116 |
NevadaNEV3-9
|
MW | 117.3 | ↑ 8 | 113/121 |
| 117 |
San Jose StateSJSU3-9
|
MW | 117.5 | ↓ 5 | 117/119 |
| 118 |
TulsaTLSA4-8
|
American | 117.8 | ↑ 5 | 114/120 |
| 119 |
Colorado StateCSU2-10
|
MW | 118.0 | ↓ 3 | 114/123 |
| 120 |
Bowling GreenBGSU4-8
|
MAC | 118.5 | - | 111/123 |
| 121 |
DelawareDEL6-6
|
C-USA | 118.8 | ↑ 1 | 116/124 |
| 122 |
Eastern MichiganEMU4-8
|
MAC | 120.3 | ↓ 1 | 116/124 |
| 123 |
RiceRICE5-7
|
American | 121.0 | ↓ 5 | 111/126 |
| 124 |
UABUAB4-8
|
American | 122.8 | ↑ 1 | 119/126 |
| 125 |
Northern IllinoisNIU3-9
|
MAC | 123.0 | ↓ 6 | 121/125 |
| 126 |
New Mexico StateNMSU4-8
|
C-USA | 126.5 | ↑ 2 | 125/128 |
| 127 |
AkronAKR5-7
|
MAC | 127.8 | - | 127/129 |
| 128 |
UTEPUTEP2-10
|
C-USA | 129.3 | ↓ 2 | 125/137 |
| 129 |
Ball StateBALL4-8
|
MAC | 130.0 | - | 126/133 |
| 130 |
Mid TennesseeMTU3-9
|
C-USA | 130.3 | ↑ 4 | 128/132 |
| 131 |
UL MonroeULM3-9
|
Sun Belt | 130.5 | ↓ 1 | 129/132 |
| 132 |
Georgia StateGAST1-11
|
Sun Belt | 130.8 | ↓ 1 | 129/133 |
| 133 |
Kent StateKENT5-7
|
MAC | 131.8 | ↓ 1 | 129/133 |
| 134 |
CharlotteCHAR1-11
|
American | 134.0 | ↑ 2 | 134/134 |
| 135 |
Sam Houston StateSHS2-10
|
C-USA | 135.8 | ↓ 4 | 132/137 |
| 136 |
MassachusettsUMASS0-12
|
Independent | 136.0 | ↓ 1 | 136/136 |
HOW WE CALCULATE: Our College Football Power Rankings are calculated by aggregating computer rankings from around the web and determining each team’s average ranking. Up or down movement within our rankings versus the previous week is provided for each team. A team's highest and lowest rankings acorss the sites we pull from are shown. Our own opinions and biases are checked at the door. We simply work with what other sites have put out.