Updated Sunday Oct. 6

2024 Composite College Football Power Rankings

Calculated by aggregating computer generated college football power rankings from around the web and determining each team’s average ranking.

RankingsStrength of Schedule
TEAM CONFERENCECONF AVERAGE
RANKINGAVG		 1-WEEK
MOVE		 HI/LO
1
Ohio StateOSU5-0
Big Ten 1.5 ↑ 2 1/2
2
TexasTEX5-0
SEC 1.5 - 1/2
3
GeorgiaUGA4-1
SEC 3.3 ↑ 1 3/4
4
AlabamaALA4-1
SEC 3.8 ↓ 3 3/4
5
Ole MissMISS5-1
SEC 5.8 ↑ 4 5/8
6
TennesseeTENN4-1
SEC 6.5 ↓ 1 6/7
7
OregonORE5-0
Big Ten 7.3 - 5/10
8
Penn StatePSU5-0
Big Ten 8.3 - 6/9
9
Notre DameND4-1
Independent 8.3 ↓ 3 7/10
10
MiamiMIA6-0
ACC 10.3 - 7/14
11
Texas A&MTAMU5-1
SEC 12.5 ↑ 8 12/13
12
ClemsonCLEM4-1
ACC 13.3 - 11/16
13
Iowa StateISU5-0
Big 12 13.3 ↑ 4 9/19
14
OklahomaOKLA4-1
SEC 14.3 - 12/17
15
LSULSU4-1
SEC 15.5 ↓ 2 13/18
16
USCUSC3-2
Big Ten 17.3 ↓ 5 13/21
17
Kansas StateKSU4-1
Big 12 17.8 ↓ 2 14/21
18
IndianaIND6-0
Big Ten 19.0 ↑ 3 14/25
19
SMUSMU5-1
ACC 19.3 ↑ 5 17/22
20
LouisvilleLOU3-2
ACC 21.0 ↓ 4 15/30
21
KentuckyUK3-2
SEC 23.8 ↑ 2 22/25
22
IowaIOWA3-2
Big Ten 24.5 - 21/28
23
MichiganMICH4-2
Big Ten 25.0 ↓ 3 11/32
24
Boise StateBSU4-1
MW 25.0 ↑ 4 19/35
25
BYUBYU5-0
Big 12 25.5 - 15/38
26
ArkansasARK4-2
SEC 26.8 ↑ 6 24/32
27
MissouriMIZ4-1
SEC 27.3 ↓ 9 22/31
28
UtahUTAH4-1
Big 12 29.0 ↓ 2 22/40
29
TulaneTULN4-2
American 29.5 ↑ 12 21/44
30
West VirginiaWVU3-2
Big 12 31.0 ↑ 17 27/33
31
WashingtonWASH4-2
Big Ten 31.5 ↑ 7 25/40
32
PittsburghPITT5-0
ACC 32.8 ↑ 8 20/43
33
South CarolinaSC3-2
SEC 34.3 ↓ 6 30/38
34
NebraskaNEB5-1
Big Ten 34.8 ↓ 3 28/38
35
FloridaFLA3-2
SEC 36.3 ↑ 9 35/37
36
Texas TechTTU5-1
Big 12 36.5 ↑ 9 26/45
37
ColoradoCOLO4-1
Big 12 38.0 ↓ 2 29/50
38
Virginia TechVT3-3
ACC 38.3 ↑ 8 28/62
39
IllinoisILL4-1
Big Ten 39.8 ↓ 3 32/47
40
RutgersRUTG4-1
Big Ten 41.0 ↓ 3 36/44
41
UNLVUNLV4-1
MW 41.0 ↓ 11 25/57
42
MarylandMD3-2
Big Ten 41.3 ↑ 1 29/50
43
AuburnAUB2-4
SEC 43.5 ↓ 1 34/58
44
Oklahoma StateOKST3-3
Big 12 44.3 ↓ 15 40/49
45
UCFUCF3-2
Big 12 44.8 ↓ 12 39/51
46
WisconsinWIS3-2
Big Ten 46.5 ↑ 12 39/54
47
Georgia TechGT4-2
ACC 46.8 ↑ 5 42/52
48
MinnesotaMINN3-3
Big Ten 48.0 ↑ 11 46/51
49
CaliforniaCAL3-2
ACC 48.0 ↑ 1 45/52
50
Washington StateWSU4-1
Pac-12 50.0 ↑ 1 33/61
51
CincinnatiCIN3-2
Big 12 50.3 ↑ 2 45/61
52
Arizona StateASU4-1
Big 12 50.8 ↑ 4 42/55
53
ArizonaARIZ3-2
Big 12 51.3 ↓ 14 44/59
54
TCUTCU3-3
Big 12 54.8 ↓ 20 51/57
55
VanderbiltVAN3-2
SEC 56.8 ↑ 15 41/66
56
MemphisMEM4-1
American 57.5 ↑ 5 53/64
57
ArmyARMY5-0
American 58.0 ↑ 10 53/61
58
KansasKU1-5
Big 12 58.3 ↓ 4 44/79
59
James MadisonJMU4-1
Sun Belt 58.3 ↓ 11 52/65
60
Boston CollegeBC4-2
ACC 58.5 ↓ 11 55/64
61
SyracuseSYR4-1
ACC 59.3 ↑ 4 54/63
62
VirginiaUVA4-1
ACC 59.8 ↑ 4 49/67
63
BaylorBAY2-4
Big 12 61.5 ↓ 8 56/68
64
DukeDUKE5-1
ACC 61.8 ↓ 7 45/70
65
NavyNAVY5-0
American 63.0 ↑ 3 54/69
66
Oregon StateORST4-1
Pac-12 63.0 ↓ 6 41/78
67
Florida StateFSU1-5
ACC 64.3 ↓ 5 59/69
68
Michigan StateMSU3-3
Big Ten 66.3 ↓ 4 63/71
69
North CarolinaUNC3-3
ACC 66.5 ↓ 6 65/68
70
UCLAUCLA1-4
Big Ten 71.0 ↑ 2 64/74
71
HoustonHOU2-4
Big 12 72.3 ↑ 13 69/80
72
ToledoTOL4-1
MAC 73.3 ↓ 1 71/75
73
Texas StateTXST3-2
Sun Belt 74.0 ↑ 10 67/90
74
Mississippi StateMSST1-4
SEC 75.3 - 68/81
75
UL LafayetteULL4-1
Sun Belt 76.8 ↑ 1 73/79
76
NC StateNCST3-3
ACC 78.3 ↓ 7 74/85
77
Fresno StateFRES3-2
MW 79.5 ↑ 1 73/88
78
LibertyLIB4-0
C-USA 80.5 ↓ 3 71/96
79
MarshallMRSH3-2
Sun Belt 81.8 ↑ 9 76/86
80
Wake ForestWAKE2-3
ACC 82.8 ↑ 10 79/85
81
Coastal CarolinaCCAR4-1
Sun Belt 82.8 ↑ 6 76/90
82
Western KentuckyWKU3-2
C-USA 83.0 ↓ 3 75/93
83
South AlabamaUSA2-4
Sun Belt 83.0 ↓ 6 73/94
84
San Jose StateSJSU4-1
MW 83.0 ↓ 4 72/96
85
StanfordSTAN2-3
ACC 84.3 ↓ 12 81/90
86
ConnecticutCONN4-2
Independent 84.5 ↓ 4 72/93
87
North TexasUNT4-1
American 84.8 ↓ 2 80/90
88
Ga SouthernGASO3-2
Sun Belt 85.5 ↓ 2 81/91
89
NorthwesternNW2-3
Big Ten 86.0 ↓ 8 84/87
90
USFUSF2-3
American 87.8 ↓ 1 75/99
91
Sam Houston StateSHS5-1
C-USA 87.8 ↑ 3 82/92
92
Northern IllinoisNIU3-2
MAC 91.3 ↓ 1 84/96
93
Bowling GreenBGSU2-3
MAC 91.8 ↓ 1 80/107
94
Jacksonville StateJSU2-3
C-USA 97.3 ↑ 11 91/112
95
Miami (OH)M-OH1-4
MAC 97.5 ↑ 2 93/102
96
UL MonroeULM4-1
Sun Belt 98.0 ↑ 10 87/105
97
Appalachian StateAPP2-3
Sun Belt 98.8 ↓ 2 95/102
98
Arkansas StateARST3-2
Sun Belt 99.3 ↑ 5 89/110
99
OhioOHIO3-2
MAC 99.8 - 92/106
100
Eastern MichiganEMU4-1
MAC 100.0 ↑ 4 98/106
101
NevadaNEV2-4
MW 100.0 ↓ 1 94/103
102
Old DominionODU1-4
Sun Belt 100.3 ↓ 4 95/110
103
UT San AntonioUTSA2-3
American 102.5 ↓ 1 95/109
104
ECUECU3-3
American 103.0 ↓ 11 100/107
105
PurduePUR1-4
Big Ten 105.8 ↓ 9 91/114
106
FAUFAU2-3
American 107.0 ↑ 2 99/115
107
Georgia StateGAST2-2
Sun Belt 107.3 ↑ 3 97/116
108
TroyTROY1-5
Sun Belt 108.5 ↓ 7 102/113
109
HawaiiHAW2-3
MW 108.5 ↓ 2 101/117
110
Colorado StateCSU2-3
MW 109.0 ↑ 1 99/113
111
San Diego StateSDSU2-3
MW 109.3 ↓ 2 104/115
112
CharlotteCHAR3-3
American 109.3 ↑ 8 106/113
113
RiceRICE1-4
American 111.5 ↑ 4 97/125
114
Western MichiganWMU2-3
MAC 111.8 - 107/116
115
WyomingWYO1-4
MW 114.5 - 106/122
116
Central MichiganCMU3-2
MAC 115.3 - 114/117
117
Air ForceAFA1-4
MW 116.0 ↓ 4 105/121
118
BuffaloBUFF3-2
MAC 116.5 - 108/122
119
FIUFIU2-3
C-USA 117.8 - 111/124
120
UABUAB1-4
American 119.0 ↓ 8 117/120
121
Utah StateUSU1-4
MW 120.3 - 116/123
122
New MexicoUNM1-4
MW 120.5 ↑ 1 117/126
123
LA TechLT1-3
C-USA 123.3 ↑ 1 119/128
124
TempleTEM1-5
American 123.5 ↑ 3 123/125
125
TulsaTLSA2-4
American 124.3 ↓ 3 118/127
126
Southern MissUSM1-4
Sun Belt 125.0 - 124/127
127
Mid TennesseeMTU1-4
C-USA 125.3 ↓ 2 122/127
128
AkronAKR1-5
MAC 129.5 ↑ 2 128/131
129
New Mexico StateNMSU1-4
C-USA 129.5 ↑ 2 126/132
130
Ball StateBALL1-4
MAC 130.0 ↓ 1 128/132
131
MassachusettsUMASS1-5
Independent 130.3 - 128/132
132
UTEPUTEP0-5
C-USA 130.3 ↓ 4 130/131
133
Kent StateKENT0-5
MAC 133.5 - 133/134
134
Kennesaw StateKENN0-5
C-USA 133.5 - 133/134

HOW WE CALCULATE: Our College Football Power Rankings are calculated by aggregating computer rankings from around the web and determining each team’s average ranking. Up or down movement within our rankings versus the previous week is provided for each team. A team's highest and lowest rankings acorss the sites we pull from are shown. Our own opinions and biases are checked at the door. We simply work with what other sites have put out.